SAREBBE PIU' CORRETTO CHIAMARLO MECCANISMO DI AVVICINAMENTO, MA CON GLI ESEMPI SI SPIEGA MEGLIO L'ESATTO OPPOSTO
PROBABILMENTE E' LA CARATTERISTICA ATTUALE DI QUALSIASI INDECISIONE SOCIALE E POLITICA
Immaginiamo di aver frequentato per diverso tempo un gruppo di qualsiasi genere,e per motivi di disaccordo ci siamo poi allontanati.Passati vari mesi od anni rientriamo in contatto con il gruppo: illustriamo cosa stiamo facendo,ma otteniamo solo un deciso taglio di comunicazione ,anche se i nostri propositi sono decisamente positivi e costruttivi.
Questa e' la componente attuale di tutta la struttura nazionale.L'esempio piu' pratico e' con le mie connessioni che ho sempre avuto con le comunita' straniere ,soprattutto con la cinese.Riapparire dopo un po' di tempo presso di loro, ed illustrare cosa stai facendo, provoca invariabilmente uno stato di incredulita' associata quasi ad uno scontro mentale con chi non ti aveva fino a quel momento conosciuto.Questo e' semplicemente dovuto alle connessioni che, nel lasso di tempo sei mancato,il gruppo ha generato con altri, ed immancabilmente si tratta di una montagna di dicerie,inventate di comodo ,per giustificare la tua "non presenza". Immancabilmente questi nuovi legami sono sempre di gradini molto bassi,in alcuni casi direttamente legati alla malavita.Nella "mancanza di politica" attuale avviene la stessa cosa: questi continui rimpasti di personaggi che prima c'erano, poi spariscono,poi riappaiono,portano solo a decine di frammentazioni, che si trasformano quindi in decine di nuovi movimenti o partiti.Quelli che erano rimasti ,invariabilmente cadevano in qualche misura sotto il controllo di forme mafiose o camorristiche.Ecco cosa hanno imparato dagli stranieri in questi anni: come giustificare il caos.
Quindi la ricetta che piaccia o meno e' solo una:la dimostrazione immediata dei soggetti, il confronto diretto,e l'accettazione delle prove, una pratica che sembra totalmente caduta in disuso, copiando totalmente il modus operandi cinese che sfugge da qualsiasi prova, pur di salvaguardare l'onore famigliare di partenza (dove di onore ce ne' veramente poco )
IT WOULD BE MORE CORRECT TO CALL ITS APPROACHING MECHANISM, BUT WITH EXAMPLES EXPLOSES EXACT OPTIMUM
PROBABLY IT IS THE ACTUAL CHARACTERISTIC OF ANY SOCIAL INDECISION AND POLITICS
Imagine having attended for a long time a group of any kind, and for reasons of disagreement we then moved away.Passed several months or years we come into contact with the group: we illustrate what we are doing, but we get only a definite cut of communication, even if our intentions are definitely positive and constructive.
This is the current component of the whole national structure. The most practical example is with my connections that I have always had with the foreign communities, especially with the Chinese. Reappear after some time with them, and illustrating what you are doing invariably causes a state of disbelief associated with a mental clash with those who had not known you until now. This is simply due to the connections that, in the time frame you missed, the group generated with others, and invariably it is a mountain of rumors, invented of convenience, to justify your "non-presence". Unfailingly these new bonds are always very low steps, in some cases directly related to the underworld. In the current "lack of politics" the same thing happens: these continuous reshuffles of characters that were there before, then disappear, then reappear, bring only to dozens of fragmentations, which are then transformed into dozens of new movements or parties. Those who remained, invariably fell to some extent under the control of mafia or camorristica forms. Here's what they learned from foreigners in these years: how to justify the chaos .
So the recipe that like it or not and 'only one: the immediate demonstration of the subjects, the direct comparison, and acceptance of evidence, a practice that seems totally fallen into disuse, totally copying the Chinese modus operandi that escapes from any trial, in order to safeguard the family honor of departure (where there is very little honor)
PROBABLY IT IS THE ACTUAL CHARACTERISTIC OF ANY SOCIAL INDECISION AND POLITICS
Imagine having attended for a long time a group of any kind, and for reasons of disagreement we then moved away.Passed several months or years we come into contact with the group: we illustrate what we are doing, but we get only a definite cut of communication, even if our intentions are definitely positive and constructive.
This is the current component of the whole national structure. The most practical example is with my connections that I have always had with the foreign communities, especially with the Chinese. Reappear after some time with them, and illustrating what you are doing invariably causes a state of disbelief associated with a mental clash with those who had not known you until now. This is simply due to the connections that, in the time frame you missed, the group generated with others, and invariably it is a mountain of rumors, invented of convenience, to justify your "non-presence". Unfailingly these new bonds are always very low steps, in some cases directly related to the underworld. In the current "lack of politics" the same thing happens: these continuous reshuffles of characters that were there before, then disappear, then reappear, bring only to dozens of fragmentations, which are then transformed into dozens of new movements or parties. Those who remained, invariably fell to some extent under the control of mafia or camorristica forms. Here's what they learned from foreigners in these years: how to justify the chaos .
So the recipe that like it or not and 'only one: the immediate demonstration of the subjects, the direct comparison, and acceptance of evidence, a practice that seems totally fallen into disuse, totally copying the Chinese modus operandi that escapes from any trial, in order to safeguard the family honor of departure (where there is very little honor)
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento